Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Batra 299:1

ואמר רב דימי בר יוסף אמר ר' אלעזר עשו מטלטלין שיור אצל עבד ולא עשו מטלטלין שיור אצל כתובה

And R. Dimi b. Joseph said in the name of R. Eleazar: Movables<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though this Mishnah speaks only of 'land', 'movables' are included. ');">¹</span> in the case of a slave were regarded<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'they made'. ');">²</span> as a reservation; but movables in the case of a <i>kethubah</i><span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If a person allotted to his wife a share in his lands when he distributed them to his sons, she loses thereby the claims of her kethubah (v. supra 132a). If, however, he gave her a share in movables only. her rights are not impaired. ');">³</span> were not regarded as a reservation!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From the fact that, in the case of a slave, 'movables' are regarded as 'land', though the latter term only is used, it follows that the expression 'land' may include movables; how, then, could R. Joseph urge that since our Mishnah spoke of 'land', movables could not have been included? ');">⁴</span> — There,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case of a slave. ');">⁵</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Batra 299:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.